Cancelled coronation of “Shakhtar” in Dnepropetrovsk, FFU violation of their own rules, and the media’s role in fomenting hysteria championship. On Tribuna.com – fresh press review.
match “Dnepr” against “Shakhtar»
main theme of last weekend was certainly the central match of the 25th round of the championship of Ukraine between the “Dnepr” and “Miner”. Browser edition of “Sport-Express in Ukraine» Nicholas Nesenyuk examines all aspects of the fight, which could be for the miners ‘gold’, but he did not.
«Coach owners, in my opinion, a virtuoso beat his counterpart from Donetsk. “Dnepr” completely pulled the plug Donetsk midfield and defense line of attack if they do, it is only on the decline. And then there’s the keeper of “Shakhtar” behaved oddly, “bringing” to save the ball completely optional.
score in this game, the miners could only one way – from the 11-meter. The fact that he has been appointed, no doubt about it. It is good that it happened only once – in the fall, I remember, in the game with the “Dnepr” beat the defending champion from “point” often.
It might seem that the team has played poorly Juande Ramos: in “Dnepr” not held the ball, the opponent spent almost the entire game in attack. Was there a choice? What could have led to an attempt to play with the champion on a collision course? And the hosts were holding pretty confident halts luck.
<...> It is good that we have not taken place at least until the last champion and three teams that make it all possible competition. They are, in fact, and keeps all our championship. Thank you for that and teams together with coaches, and those who encourage them to play well “- sums up the journalist.
chances of “Shakhtar” ahead to win the gold medal
Following the central match of the last round were formed largely conflicting opinions. For example, a journalist of the newspaper “The team» Eugene Gres , analyzing tournament chances Donetsk club, believes that early miners ordered fireworks, and laments the special conditions prevailing for some teams in the Premier League.
«It seems to me that in weak championships team, who collected 83% after the league race 93% of the points, could easily go to the next game of beer pub or, at least, from the wine cellar, but the” Miner “at best can only become a champion in the next round. Ironically, this game will take on the day of the miners “Donbass Arena” of his nearest rival, so prospective salute in Donetsk will be wearing some cases even symbolic. Although let’s not be too hasty – “Metalist” scored excellent shape, and the goals of Clayton Xavier become a decoration of each round!
<...> In general finish of the season all good. Lovers of statistics in order to determine the tactics of the game the team is no longer sufficient lead goals scored after the standards flank attacks or kontrvypadov. Even the penalty considered unfashionable! It is time to sum up the scoring strokes, which are applied from the “out of the game».
This season, some teams are not only the most earn a penalty, but also claim the victory in the competition: “And you can not see an offside position? ..»
<...> Returning to the penalty and offside, would suggest that in some places may not agree with my reasoning. In the end, in order to earn the privilege referred to arbitrators, one must at least play attacking football, or even better – to collect skilled performers.
That’s just what happens to this skill when some show his face probation Norwegian “Tromsø” and Austrian “Austrii” – a question that does not dare to answer none of the experts “- says columnist.
foul FFU from the Premier League
Control and Disciplinary Committee of the FFU, which typically considers various violations of rules by the clubs and players, this time can be considered a case of abuse by their own employees. About the situation said the chief editor of “Football» Artem Franks .
«Along with the legendary striker Ivan Getsko draw procedure carried out (showing the audience a piece of paper with the numbers of elongated balls) Eugene Savage, presented as the” head of the sports department of the Premier League, “or something like that, in general, far not a simple clerk.
The problem is that the Wild are not the only employee of FDA, but also a member / secretary of the Control and Disciplinary Committee of FFU …
Open
disciplinary rules FFU, article 58, paragraph 2:
«Heads, deputies and members of the FTC and the AK can not be members of the executive committee or the presidium of FFU, the heads of entities that hold competitions, clubs, and at the same time be members of another body».
Legal loophole here in the word “leader” – can it be considered the Wild (which we do not have the slightest professional claims, on the contrary – the compliments!) to those in the FDA, and if not, who will wear only the president there? However, in our humble opinion, the notorious conflict of interest is taking place. It consists in the fact that many cases are brought to the FTC, are cooked in the Premier League! Maybe it’s some sort of concession to FDA, which does away the right of football justice, depriving it of its own DC? Well, should have said, “- said the author.
possibility of introducing the play-offs in the Championship of Ukraine
Following the next round of the Ukrainian championship picture is formed when some teams have already secured their place in the Premier League next season, and frankly “serving number” on the field. Honored coach of Ukraine and Russia Vyacheslav Grozny in his column in the newspaper “Sport-Express in Ukraine” offers an innovation that should help get rid of this problem.
«Looking matches of the tour, I can not fail to note that, unfortunately, more than a month before the end of the season in the championship there is a group of commands that generally would not fight. This can not upset. I think it would be right footfall Premier League following the example of Russia, where the teams from the lower part of the table play offs with the leaders of the first division, and thus gaining the right to participate in the elite division. I am sure we will soon be forgotten about the walk-through games, and Ukrainian football will only benefit “, – the expert believes.
media’s role in shaping the image of Ukrainian football
Recently, almost after every round of the championship of Ukraine ignite a variety of scandals, often little connection with the actual football. Site Explorer “Pressing» Viktor Zhuravlev believes that the media are actively condoning these scandals, adversely affect the image of the national championship.
«Accidentally or not, but this season the reputation of the Ukrainian football has fallen extremely low, and its image in the present form mainly scandals, disassembly, endless talk about bias and lack of professionalism of judges.
Add in Lausanne shadow hanging over “Metalist” and “Carpathians”, the financial difficulties of a number of clubs in the top division and the majority of teams from lower leagues, which disintegrated speculation about “pool Kolomoyskogo” and the burgeoning “Akhmetov pool” – get very very ugly picture. And in many ways it “paint” TV is having the rights to show matches of Ukraine and, accordingly, producing thematic programs about football.
chasing a rating, the domestic TV focuses on something “fried”, “yellow”, “conspiracy” at the expense of actually playing. Perhaps because of this reaching some short-term goals, it will definitely lose strategically. After all, thereby TV “own” reduces the total capitalization of the product under the name “Ukrainian football”, reduces its commercial appeal.
<...> Heated constant talk about the bias of arbitrators fans judge any action aimed at punishing their team perceived as a call to violent action. Any referee whistle accompanied by this stream of abuse from the stands. Sometimes it even turns into a multi-voiced, Continuous frankly obscene chant slogans.
<...> From all this follows a logical question. Who will take the responsibility if the next time pumped from the TV screens and pages of media hysteria okolofutbolnaya motivate the fans of a club on an even more radical action (spontaneous or planned – no difference)? And this question is not rhetorical … “- sums up Zhuravlev.
No comments:
Post a Comment