TV, bought a shop window, the court returned the seller – “Notepad Krasnoyarsk”

The man who bought low-quality TV, but the court was able to return it to the store.

A resident of the village of Krasnoyarsk Territory Novoselovo bought a TV SUPRA STV-LC39660FL over 17 thousand. rubles. The item he took with windows, connect to the network and to check for defects in the store did not.

Just arrived home, the buyer discovered a serious flaw – the image is strongly distorted. Watch this TV was impossible. The next day, unhappy man technique back to the shop and asked him to change or return the money.

Experts service center to check the technique and found that there is a mechanical failure of the matrix, but the defect is not covered by warranty. And since the case is not a guarantee, shop refused to replace the TV and in the return of money paid.

In the course of the designated court examination, the experts found that the damage arose from a blow with a blunt object on the screen, on the cardboard packaging has been found small dent. The expert pointed out that the failure caused by either unskilled Movements TV or improper packing it.

The Court examined the video from surveillance cameras, confirming that the seller removed the TV show-windows, it does not include it in the network and has not verified .

On the basis of the rules of law, that the responsibility for defects under warranty shall be borne by the seller, the court granted the plaintiff’s claim for refund for defective TV set amount.

The magistrate Novoselovo district decided to collect from the individual entrepreneur for the benefit of men 17 thousand. rubles, the cost of the TV, 3 thousand. rubles as compensation for moral damage and 10 thousand. rubles fine in addition – 15 thousand. rubles costs of the Forensic and 2 thousand. rubles, the cost of drawing up the statement of claim. Buyer court ordered the seller to return the TV.

Sold by the decision challenged. He believed that a quality product is sold, and he broke out of the fact that the buyer incorrectly transported.

However, the higher courts did not agree with him, pointing out that it was necessary to provide evidence confirming the absence of flaws in the TV before it is transferred to the buyer. News Bloknot Krasnoyarsk