And the advantage, and the trouble of Moscow is that it all too much. This is both good and bad – from obesity die, too, as you know. Somewhere disadvantage weedy soil, and here surplus. As one of my friends said, in Moscow to have a suit that has not penetrated into you too much information.
features fabulous, under which the Soviet government did not have such. Book Publishing – for every taste! The overabundance of authors, including many new ones. Fantastic art exhibitions, from limiting the expansion of the traditional arts to conservatism. On the music scene all right. Theaters? Please. Large theaters do not always do well, because the freeze, but a lot of little interest. Cinema also is developing dynamically. The bad news is that we are behind the language of contemporary cinema. Often those movies that get the Cannes’ Palme d’Or “, we fail at the box office.
In this sense, more or less advanced – is television. Although the situation is not as prosperous as in France or Germany, where there are analogues of the channel “Culture”. For example, the magnitude of the TV channel “Arte” is not comparable to ours. Yes, we do not want to channel “Culture” was advertising. A state can not finance it as funded by modern TV. But on the other hand, let’s look back on ten years ago. And it becomes clear that sin is whining because the channel “Culture” – all right. Just always want more – this is a normal human desire.
My happiness is that I came on television, already deeply mature man – in forty years. Usually, at this time since leaving television. That is not blown me away from what I show. I understand that sooner or later I came, so I’ll leave. But while you’re here, if you please to do a good job. The main rule is: if you come on TV, forget who you were before the start of the transfer, and who’ll be after its completion. And: TV – at least for the educated, though not for the educated – many do not. It can only show that there is life somewhere in the depth. And to offer: a look if you’re interested, go there and find something for yourself. But as soon as it goes back, it begins to lose its audience. Because, let’s say, if we’re talking about science, the artist is a bit much, but the scientist is not enough, if we are talking about art, on the contrary, the artist is not enough, a scientist too much. And here all the time t o keep the middle.
What television can give? It can encrypt the void may slightly raise the level of – I think it’s very important and certainly the most difficult of all that I do. Including physically. Write four programs a day, changing only the coat – it’s physical labor. Because you depend on the transfer of not only themselves, but also from the operator, participants, and so on. This workshop, and I foreman. The point of view of the lead, in my opinion, should be prigashena. Transparent to the end, he can not be, because he has his own position. If he does not, then he does the viewer uninteresting. But if he is starting to cram in every pause, then why would the other called? Lead I would compare with the conductor. The orchestra does not get worse by the fact that playing first violin and is a dialogue of the second and the third. On the contrary, they sound more harmonious, and the more complex they are a party, the better conductor. Good sound of the orche stra conductor achieves through his inner passion and bad – at the expense of speed. It increases the rate at poltakta and – away we go. On television – it’s all the time. When you failed transmission, will you mount it so that it flew by quickly and quietly.
Of course, at times it gives me more pleasure to write books, and occasionally lectures. But this results in a different sense. The book, if it is good to be republished, and long, but little by little influence on a number of people. And here you are on the air, and immediately realized you forgot one second, as soon as the transfer is over.
No comments:
Post a Comment